Termination w.r.t. Q of the following Term Rewriting System could be proven:
Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
rev(nil) → nil
rev(.(x, y)) → ++(rev(y), .(x, nil))
car(.(x, y)) → x
cdr(.(x, y)) → y
null(nil) → true
null(.(x, y)) → false
++(nil, y) → y
++(.(x, y), z) → .(x, ++(y, z))
Q is empty.
↳ QTRS
↳ DirectTerminationProof
Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
rev(nil) → nil
rev(.(x, y)) → ++(rev(y), .(x, nil))
car(.(x, y)) → x
cdr(.(x, y)) → y
null(nil) → true
null(.(x, y)) → false
++(nil, y) → y
++(.(x, y), z) → .(x, ++(y, z))
Q is empty.
We use [23] with the following order to prove termination.
Recursive path order with status [2].
Precedence:
rev1 > nil
rev1 > ++2 > .2
null1 > true
null1 > false
Status:
trivial